Sunday, February 23, 2014

Weekend Outlook 02/23/2014

I apologize for the absence of posts late last week. The past few years seem to have been marked by one medical situation after another. As soon as one abates, another arises; this time in the form of a fractured wrist suffered by my wife, a result of an over abundance of ice around here lately. So in addition to my real job, I will be pulling double duty around the house for the next several weeks.

I have recently been trying to heed some unintended advice from someone whose opinion I have come to respect over the last few years, and someone I had come to regard as a friend. I fear I have damaged that relationship to some extent with some ill-chosen words, but still respect his opinion. This advice has to do with not seeing the forest for the trees, and conversely sometimes missing the trees for the forest. I have been told I tend to over complicate things, and in some respects that is true. Lately I seem to have been caught somewhere between the trees and the forest, so I have been trying to keep both of those in mind in my analysis. But I am sure no one comes here to hear about me, so I will leave it at that, and offer that analysis.


I will start with the trees, in particular the short term count from the recent 1847.50 high, and work my way out to the forest.  From 1847.50, I count 5 waves down, 1843.26-1845.05-1834.05-1841.71-1824.58. The SPX then completed three waves to the upside, 1842.79-1839.25-1846.13.



If one then widens one’s view to the 15 minute chart, one can see how this completes a 5 wave sequence from the 1737.92 low. From this low, the index completed the first wave at 1798.03, and then Wave A of an inverted corrective wave at 1791.83. Wave B then completed at 1822.27 and Wave C at 1809.22. Notice that the end of Wave B, 1822.27, completed below the high of the wave which was 1826.55. This was due to Wave D of an inverted corrective wave completing at 1826.55, and then Waves 3, 4, and 5 completing beneath that high. Wave D of 2 from 1737.92 followed, completing at 1847.50. The 5 wave sequence that followed, the sequence I started with was then Wave E, and completed the inverted corrective Wave2. The three waves I described from that point then completed Waves 3, 4, and 5, and a complete sequence from the 1737.92 low. Just as was seen in Wave B of this sequence, this sequence completed below the actual high of the sequence, which was 1847.50.


With a sequence seemingly completed from the 1737.92 low, one can once again widen the view, this time to the 4 Hour chart. This time frame tracks the sequence from the 1560.33 low. Wave 1 of this sequence completed at 1709.36. After more review, I have reverted to my original count for the next wave, going back to the 1639.43-1669.51-1627.47-1729.86-1646.47 inverted wave. This still seems to be the most appropriate count, and for now I will call this Wave 2 from the 1560.33 low. Assuming that count, I would next say that the move from 1646.47 to 1850.84 completed in 5 waves, and would become Wave 3. This wave gave me quite a bit of trouble during its formation. I counted the first three waves, 1711.57-1695.93-1759.33, and was looking for the completion of waves 4 and 5, but the SPX became somewhat choppy at that point and quite complicated to follow. After much consternation it now appears that Wave 4 was a very complex double inverted corrective wave, which also included a semi-inverted corrective wave. This will also play a part in an alternate count I will discuss shortly. The first inverted corrective wave completed between 1759.33 and 1746.20. This then became Wave A of a larger inverted corrective wave. Wave B carried the index to 1849.44, and had a semi inverted second wave. Waves C, D, and E, and Wave 4 from 1646.47 then finally completed at 1815.52. A final move higher to 1850.84 completed the sequence and Wave 3 from 1560.33 in this scenario. The drop to 1737.92 that followed would be Wave 4, with Wave 5 underway. Under this scenario the recently completed sequence at 1846.13 would be Wave 1 of 5. This would be a very bullish scenario, and would have an ideal target of SPX 2001.

In this scenario I would be looking for a small pullback, to be followed by a resumption of the move higher. Short term support would be at 1826, and then 1793. At this point, any move above 1846.13 would solidify this scenario.

The alternate scenario I alluded to has Wave 1 completing at 1709.36, followed by the inverted corrective wave that completes at 1646.47. However, in this scenario, this inverted corrective wave is Wave A of a larger inverted corrective wave, similar to the Wave 4 I described previously. The move to 1850.84 would then be Wave B, 1737.92 Wave C, and 1846.13 Wave D. That would put the SPX in Wave E of 2 from the 1560.33 low. In this scenario I would expect the SPX to move lower, to near the 1737.92 low to complete this wave. The actual target at this point would be 1733. From there the index should continue higher, but I like this to complete back near the 1850 level.

At the moment I prefer this scenario, but it hinges on the SPX remaining below 1846.13. Short term support is at 1826 and then 1793, while resistance is at 1844-1845.





3 comments:

  1. Hey Steve; No need to apologize for "anything", it's called "caring"! Sorry to hear about Mrs. Krause. If you need any cooking lessons...please DO NOT call me! Haaaaaa! Well, I'll let others be the judge of that.
    The market: We are now trading above the 1850 level, intra-day of course and riding the upper keltner channel. Is 1900 on the way? I believe it is but been wrong lately.
    All my best, J

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks J. The Mrs. and I appreciate the sentiment. I can hold my own cooking -wise, its more the cleaning and laundry....

      I have had my own troubles with this market. Every time it reaches a point where it seems it should break down it doesn't. 1873-1900 could be next; I think the next move could be the tell. Above today's high and the SPX could be headed much higher. Below 1835 and watch out.

      GL whatever side you're on. Hard to bet against this market. And you're most likely a better cook than you're letting on.

      My best to you and your's,
      Steve

      Delete
    2. Looks like you were on the right side J. Congrats! Now you don't have to worry about cooking. You can treat yourself to a night out.

      Steve

      Delete