It was “another day, another twenty points to the
upside” for the SPX. I will be the first to admit that my count since the SPX
reached 1740 has been somewhat suspect. Following today’s action it became
readily apparent that I needed to re-evaluate my count from the 1850.84 high. I
have spent much of the night doing just that, and have adjusted my counts
accordingly. Although my count from 1850.84 has changed, my outlook remains the
same. I continue to count 1850.84 as the completion of a 5 wave sequence from
the October 2011 1074.77 low. This does not, however, complete a sequence from
the 666.79 low.
I still think the bull run from the 666.79 low has
further to go, and I was expecting a correction to 1679 before a resumption of the
move higher. Although there are several different scenarios from 1850.84, I
will save that for a later date. At the moment I will concentrate on the
shorter term count from that point.
From 1850.84, the SPX made an initial drop to
1835.23. I still consider this Wave 1. After bouncing higher to 1849.31, the
index fell sharply over the next two weeks to 1737.92. This has been the
perplexing move, as the fell steeply at points, and then went into very choppy
periods. I had some trouble deciphering and tracking all the moves. I now
believe this entire move was one single 5 wave sequence. So from the 1850.84
high, I have 1835.23 as Wave 1, the bounce to 1849.31 as Wave A of an inverted
corrective Wave 2, followed by Wave B of 2 to 1737.92. It appears that Wave C
completed at 1798.03 and Wave D at 1792.01. Today’s high of 1823.54 falls
within the range to complete Wave E, and thus Wave 2, although 1831 would be
the upper boundary for this wave.
This count still implies further downside, and I
will keep my target of 1679. A move above 1831 would invalidate this count, and
at that point I would have to consider the next move to new highs started at
the 1737.92 low.
I enjoy your blog very much and appreciate your hard work and the thought you put into this. Thanks for sharing your insights and helping inform the uninformed.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much.
DeleteSteve