Saturday, June 9, 2012

Friday's Market 06/08/2012

 
I hope you find this blog useful, and informative. I appreciate any feedback.
According to my model, wave 5 of the move from 1267 began on Wednesday at 1294.96. Wave 5 started with a short wave 1, followed by an inverted corrective wave 2, which took the market to 1311, before completing at 1306. Wave 3 propelled the market to 1329, sparked by a gap opening on Thursday. After completing wave 3, the SPX faltered for the first time since the rally began. The index fell to 1318, rallied to 1325, and then completed a 5 wave sequence at 1312.68. In Thursday’s update, I said that even with a 5 wave sequence completed, there was room for a move lower, with support at 1306-1307. From there I expected one more move to a new rally high. Friday morning the market did open lower, with the SPX moving to 1307.77, and completing another 5 wave sequence from 1329. This completed wave 4 of 5.

The market then began to work its way higher, completing a 5 wave sequence at 1323, with each impulsive wave increasing in length. From there, into the close, the market traded in a narrow range, forming what I believe to be an inverted corrective wave, which terminated at 1324.10, shortly before the close.

I believe we are now in wave 3 of 5 of 5 from 1267. Wave 5 should terminate between 1333, and 1337, with wave 3 reaching above 1329, most likely 1331-1332, a pullback of a point or two, and a final high between 1333 and 1337. With wave 5 completed, a corrective of some sort is due. Should the market fall below 1308 before making a new rally high, I would say 1329 was the wave 5 high.
Over the weekend I will give more detail on why I have targeted 1333-1337, and also what might be expected after reaching that high.
Thank you for your interest and support.






2 comments:

  1. Hi Steve, I really appreciate your effort! May I know how you select a data as goodfit to your model? And how to use R2 to project?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jeff.
      My model is based on correlations between waves, and certain parameters I've identified. Data is not chosen, but identified by model correlations. Usually above .99. Secondary relationships have the same basis, but I use different parameters. At the moment those parameters are proprietary.
      Steve

      Delete