A little pressed for time tonight, so I'll try to hit the highlights. The trading was a little choppier today than we have seen lately. For the most part the SPX continued the small rally from yesterday's 2380.52 low. But in interesting fashion. I count a 5 wave sequence from that low to 2431.03. Appears to be a complex corrective wave from 2431.03 to 2385.83, then another 5 wave sequence from there to the day's high of 2466.97. In other words three waves from yesterday's low to today's high. I would expect the wave to unfold in 5 waves, which opens up some interesting possibilities. Either this move higher ha not completed, or yesterday's low was but a first wave instead of all of Wave 3 from the 3393.52 high. Or potentially more downside to come.
For now we'll keep an eye on the levels mentioned yesterday:
A move above 2553.93 would likely mean at least a short term bottom is in.
Adjusting for today's move higher, support for a final wave of this move becomes 2290-2135. So a move below 2135 would mean there is more work to be done to the downside. If the SPX moves into the 2290-2135 range, 2466.97 becomes the level to look for a move higher.
To expand on the three waves up from today. If that holds true, the diagonal on the chart would likely be broken to the downside. Thinking in terms of the down waves I spoke of the other day, it means today's high would be the completion of 4 of 9 waves.
This blog introduces a new way to analyze the stock market. The 5 Wave Model uses relationships between up and down movements, or waves, in the price action to determine turning points in the market.
Thursday, March 19, 2020
Market Update 03/18/2020
The SPX opened lower again this morning, dropping to 2385.34 before attempting to rally. That attempt took the index back up to 2453.57 before resuming the march lower to 2280.52, which proved to be the low of the day. From there the index staged a more robust rally through the afternoon, moving up to 2409.81 just before the close. This one again brought the SPX into overbought territory on the 15 minute chart. The low of 2280.52 is notable also, reaching the bottom trend line of what appears to be a triangle, which I, and several others have noted. That is the point where it staged the afternoon rally. It also brought the index into the zone that would complete a 5 wave sequence for the alternate count I talked about yesterday. So an area watch.
But for now I will still go with my primary count. In yesterday's post I stated that count would require the SPX to complete the final 3 waves before completing. With the action today, it os possible the SPX completed 2 of those waves with the move lower to 2280.52, and the afternoon rally back to 2409.81. With the SPX hitting overbought on the 15 minute chart at the close, 2409.81 may be the end of that wave. If so, and with just one wave to complete, it allows us to give some targets to look for. if my count is correct, and 2409.81 was the completion of a wave, the final wave projects to the 2254-2087 range. Not quite hitting 2030, but within that target range.
So as always a few caveats. One of the useful aspects of my model is giving specific ranges for targets, so it helps to clarify where to look, and gives you a specific point where you know something else is going on. So what to look for today:
If the SPX does not take out today's 2280.52 low, and moves above yesterday's 2553.93 high, it would be highly likely that my alternate cunt was in play, and the index might be in for a move higher.
If the the SPX moves into the 2254-2087 range, and then takes out the 2409.81 high from today, my primary count would be in play, and that would likely complete a 5 wave sequence from 3393.52.
If the SPX falls below 2087, it would mean that today's 2280.52 low was not the end of the 7th wave, but only a part of it. Which means the index would potentially have more downside.
And now, if nobody minds, I'd like to add a few personal words. So those interested only in the analysis can stop there.
First I'd like to thank Lunker for maintaining his blog. It can be a lot of work, and takes a lot of time, and I know I'm not the only one who appreciates the effort.
Secondly I'd like to thank those who have had kind words, and have shown interest in my work. It is more than greatly appreciated.
I started working on what has turned into my 5 Wave Model over 10 years ago. Similar in ways to Elliott Wave, but quite different in many respects also. So when I began developing the model, I started looking at Elliott Wave blogs because they were the closest thing to my work.At some point I stumbled across The Elliott Wave Lives On, by Tony Caldaro. For many years I found it fun and enjoyable to share my work, and exchange ideas with others. For several reasons, which aren't important here, I decided to stop posting there, and stopped working on my own blog posts. I still followed to blog, mainly because of the respect I came to have for Tony, and his methods. One of the things that struck me about Tony was his commitment to sharing his ideas, and his belief that we owed it to others to pass on knowledge. That it was our responsibility. I was always amazed at his tolerance for people who were unkind in their words to him. Made me respect him more. I, along with many others, was saddened by his passing. But it also made me think about some things, and motivated me to start sharing my ideas again. I in no way want to compare myself, or my ideas to Tony's and his, but rather take some of philosophies to heart.
So my purpose here is simply to share my ideas. If you find value in them, use them, if you think it's a garbage, feel free to disregard them. I have tried to for over a decade, but it works. But it is not the magic bullet. Like every other method, it works wonderfully at times, and fails miserably at others. It is a tool that I hope some can add to their box and find useful.
I do not give financial advice. I do not give trading advice. I am not a trader. I trade, but I'm not a trader. I do not have a multi-million dollar trading account that I can take screen shots of. I am not perfect. My model is not perfect. My interpretations are not perfect. This is not my job. I have a different job. So sometimes my posts will be late at night, sometimes short, sometimes not there. But I will do my best to at least give a short update as much as I can. Some posts will be more detailed than others. As this is my own model, I will try to explain the terminology, and thought process the best I can. Feel free to ask questions if you'd like. I will answer as best I can.
So, again, I am simply here to share my ideas. It is a work in progress, so I will add things as I can. My sincere thanks again for the interest.
But for now I will still go with my primary count. In yesterday's post I stated that count would require the SPX to complete the final 3 waves before completing. With the action today, it os possible the SPX completed 2 of those waves with the move lower to 2280.52, and the afternoon rally back to 2409.81. With the SPX hitting overbought on the 15 minute chart at the close, 2409.81 may be the end of that wave. If so, and with just one wave to complete, it allows us to give some targets to look for. if my count is correct, and 2409.81 was the completion of a wave, the final wave projects to the 2254-2087 range. Not quite hitting 2030, but within that target range.
So as always a few caveats. One of the useful aspects of my model is giving specific ranges for targets, so it helps to clarify where to look, and gives you a specific point where you know something else is going on. So what to look for today:
If the SPX does not take out today's 2280.52 low, and moves above yesterday's 2553.93 high, it would be highly likely that my alternate cunt was in play, and the index might be in for a move higher.
If the the SPX moves into the 2254-2087 range, and then takes out the 2409.81 high from today, my primary count would be in play, and that would likely complete a 5 wave sequence from 3393.52.
If the SPX falls below 2087, it would mean that today's 2280.52 low was not the end of the 7th wave, but only a part of it. Which means the index would potentially have more downside.
And now, if nobody minds, I'd like to add a few personal words. So those interested only in the analysis can stop there.
First I'd like to thank Lunker for maintaining his blog. It can be a lot of work, and takes a lot of time, and I know I'm not the only one who appreciates the effort.
Secondly I'd like to thank those who have had kind words, and have shown interest in my work. It is more than greatly appreciated.
I started working on what has turned into my 5 Wave Model over 10 years ago. Similar in ways to Elliott Wave, but quite different in many respects also. So when I began developing the model, I started looking at Elliott Wave blogs because they were the closest thing to my work.At some point I stumbled across The Elliott Wave Lives On, by Tony Caldaro. For many years I found it fun and enjoyable to share my work, and exchange ideas with others. For several reasons, which aren't important here, I decided to stop posting there, and stopped working on my own blog posts. I still followed to blog, mainly because of the respect I came to have for Tony, and his methods. One of the things that struck me about Tony was his commitment to sharing his ideas, and his belief that we owed it to others to pass on knowledge. That it was our responsibility. I was always amazed at his tolerance for people who were unkind in their words to him. Made me respect him more. I, along with many others, was saddened by his passing. But it also made me think about some things, and motivated me to start sharing my ideas again. I in no way want to compare myself, or my ideas to Tony's and his, but rather take some of philosophies to heart.
So my purpose here is simply to share my ideas. If you find value in them, use them, if you think it's a garbage, feel free to disregard them. I have tried to for over a decade, but it works. But it is not the magic bullet. Like every other method, it works wonderfully at times, and fails miserably at others. It is a tool that I hope some can add to their box and find useful.
I do not give financial advice. I do not give trading advice. I am not a trader. I trade, but I'm not a trader. I do not have a multi-million dollar trading account that I can take screen shots of. I am not perfect. My model is not perfect. My interpretations are not perfect. This is not my job. I have a different job. So sometimes my posts will be late at night, sometimes short, sometimes not there. But I will do my best to at least give a short update as much as I can. Some posts will be more detailed than others. As this is my own model, I will try to explain the terminology, and thought process the best I can. Feel free to ask questions if you'd like. I will answer as best I can.
So, again, I am simply here to share my ideas. It is a work in progress, so I will add things as I can. My sincere thanks again for the interest.
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Market Update 03/17/2020
Yesterday I talked about the possibility of Monday's 2380.94 low being the end of Wave D, with the likelihood of the SPX following that with a rally into the 2537-2666 zone.
The index did open sightly higher, making it to 2463.54 before reversing course, and falling slightly below Monday's low to 2367.04. The SPX quickly ran up to 2553.93 by midday. The move to a slightly lower low did change the resistance zone to an extent, but not significantly. 2553.93 put the index right within the 2537-2666 resistance zone I spoke of. Once hitting that zone the index pulled back to 2448.00, and then spent the rest of the afternoon trading between those two numbers.
So where does this leave us in my count? From the 3393.52 high, I am counting 2880.89 as Wave 1 of a five wave sequence. The SPX, in my view, has been forming an inverted corrective wave from that point, with 3136.72 being Wave A. Wave B ended at 2478.86, and the rally to 2710.89 as Wave C. Today's low of 2367.04 would be Wave D, and the subsequent rally to 2553.93 Wave E, completing Wave 2.
I realize that most people are not familiar with my terminology, so I will try to simplify it here, hopefully making where we are in my count clearer. The easiest way to think of it, would be to see each wave in my model as breaking down into 9 identifiable waves. There are a number of reasons why I label the waves as I do, with the main one being the relationships between waves. For those familiar with Elliott Wave counts, you can think of it as being a 1-2-1-2-3-4-3-4-5 sequence, which is 9 waves. In my model that would be labeled as 1-A-B-C-D-E(2)-3-4-5, with the A-B-C-D-E portion being what I call inverted corrective waves. So, 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9, equates to 1-2-1-2-3-4-3-4-5 in Elliott Wave, which equates to 1-A-B-C-D-E(2)-3-4-5, in my 5 Wave Model. I count 5 wave sequences in both impulsive and corrective waves, so I won't equate it with Elliott Wave corrective counts. Obviously there are numerous variations for all of these, but that would be the simplest way to look at it. There are also many differences between my 5 Wave Model, and Elliot Wave, so this is only equating count sequences between the two for clarity.
So given that, if Wave E(2) completed today at 2553.93, it means the SPX has completed 6 of the 9 waves, with 7-8-9 to follow. I am currently still expecting this sequence to complete at my 2030 target level. The past few days I have been considering other possibilities, such as the SPX putting in a shorter term low, and undergoing a short term rally before moving down to 2030. That is still possible, but normally if that were to happen, it would occur either as "B" or "D" waves of the inverted corrective wave, or a smaller magnitude sequence would occurred.
Another reason for that conclusion is the relationships that form between waves. The 2030 target was based on the relationship between the 666.79 low, the 3393.52 high, and the intervening waves. The conclusion of this sequence will depend on the relationship between the first, third, and fifth waves of this sequence. But with Wave E(2) possibly completing today, I was able to look at several secondary relationships, and one of them confirms the 2030 number.
But I don't want to get too far ahead of myself. Let's stick to what we know. It does appear that today's low of 2367.04 was Wave D. But Wave E has not been confirmed yet, so a move above the resistance zone I mentioned yesterday would still negate this count.I will adjust the upper bound of that level to 2653 to take into account the new low. I also mentioned yesterday a possible alternate count. That is still a possibility, so if 2553.93 proves to be Wave E, the sequence from 3393.52 could complete under 2400, so a slightly lower low than today and rebound could bring this into play. Especially if we bounce off the bottom trend line, which looks to be around 2300.
The index did open sightly higher, making it to 2463.54 before reversing course, and falling slightly below Monday's low to 2367.04. The SPX quickly ran up to 2553.93 by midday. The move to a slightly lower low did change the resistance zone to an extent, but not significantly. 2553.93 put the index right within the 2537-2666 resistance zone I spoke of. Once hitting that zone the index pulled back to 2448.00, and then spent the rest of the afternoon trading between those two numbers.
So where does this leave us in my count? From the 3393.52 high, I am counting 2880.89 as Wave 1 of a five wave sequence. The SPX, in my view, has been forming an inverted corrective wave from that point, with 3136.72 being Wave A. Wave B ended at 2478.86, and the rally to 2710.89 as Wave C. Today's low of 2367.04 would be Wave D, and the subsequent rally to 2553.93 Wave E, completing Wave 2.
I realize that most people are not familiar with my terminology, so I will try to simplify it here, hopefully making where we are in my count clearer. The easiest way to think of it, would be to see each wave in my model as breaking down into 9 identifiable waves. There are a number of reasons why I label the waves as I do, with the main one being the relationships between waves. For those familiar with Elliott Wave counts, you can think of it as being a 1-2-1-2-3-4-3-4-5 sequence, which is 9 waves. In my model that would be labeled as 1-A-B-C-D-E(2)-3-4-5, with the A-B-C-D-E portion being what I call inverted corrective waves. So, 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9, equates to 1-2-1-2-3-4-3-4-5 in Elliott Wave, which equates to 1-A-B-C-D-E(2)-3-4-5, in my 5 Wave Model. I count 5 wave sequences in both impulsive and corrective waves, so I won't equate it with Elliott Wave corrective counts. Obviously there are numerous variations for all of these, but that would be the simplest way to look at it. There are also many differences between my 5 Wave Model, and Elliot Wave, so this is only equating count sequences between the two for clarity.
So given that, if Wave E(2) completed today at 2553.93, it means the SPX has completed 6 of the 9 waves, with 7-8-9 to follow. I am currently still expecting this sequence to complete at my 2030 target level. The past few days I have been considering other possibilities, such as the SPX putting in a shorter term low, and undergoing a short term rally before moving down to 2030. That is still possible, but normally if that were to happen, it would occur either as "B" or "D" waves of the inverted corrective wave, or a smaller magnitude sequence would occurred.
Another reason for that conclusion is the relationships that form between waves. The 2030 target was based on the relationship between the 666.79 low, the 3393.52 high, and the intervening waves. The conclusion of this sequence will depend on the relationship between the first, third, and fifth waves of this sequence. But with Wave E(2) possibly completing today, I was able to look at several secondary relationships, and one of them confirms the 2030 number.
But I don't want to get too far ahead of myself. Let's stick to what we know. It does appear that today's low of 2367.04 was Wave D. But Wave E has not been confirmed yet, so a move above the resistance zone I mentioned yesterday would still negate this count.I will adjust the upper bound of that level to 2653 to take into account the new low. I also mentioned yesterday a possible alternate count. That is still a possibility, so if 2553.93 proves to be Wave E, the sequence from 3393.52 could complete under 2400, so a slightly lower low than today and rebound could bring this into play. Especially if we bounce off the bottom trend line, which looks to be around 2300.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)