Well, today obviously did not go as I had expected. After the SPX completed a 5 wave sequence
from 1739.66 yesterday afternoon, it seemed probable that the index would
resume the downtrend from the 1850.84 high. That did not happen, as the SPX
moved to 1788.25 near the open, pulled back to 1777, and then moved steadily
higher throughout the remainder of the day, topping out at 1798.03.
Looking at today’s move, it appears to be one
complete 5 wave sequence, 1788.25-1786.63-1795.47-1793.98-1798.03, which
included an inverted corrective Wave 2, 1777.28-1788.63-1786.77-1788.6-1786.83.
If you recall, I had counted yesterday’s high as the completion of a semi –inverted
corrective wave from 1739.66 low, and the completion of Wave E which completed
an inverted corrective Wave 2 from the 1850.84 high. I had mentioned that the
SPX could move higher and still support this count, the index moved above the
upper boundary for this count, making it invalid.
With that count invalid, I must now re-evaluate my
count. This takes me back to the January 29th 1770.45 low. This is
the termination point of Wave C of the inverted corrective Wave 2 from 1850.84.
From that point I have counted 5 complete 5 wave sequences, 1798.77-1739.66-1773.46-1771.33-1798.03,
which brings us to today’s high. This series is interesting because it meets
the criteria for a 5 wave sequence. So the entire move from the 1770.45 low can
be viewed as an inverted corrective wave. This can be either all of Wave C of
the inverted corrective wave from 1850.84, or it could mean that the SPX
completed 3 waves from 1850.84 as 1835.23-1849.31-1770.45, which was then
followed by an inverted corrective Wave 4. Both of these counts suggest that
the downtrend should now resume.
Of the two scenarios listed above, the first would
still target 1679, while the second would present a very bearish case,
targeting much lower than 1679. If the SPX continues higher from this point,
the probabilities increase that the index is headed to new highs. It is also
important to note that I still consider 1850.84 the completion of a sequence
from 1074.77, and both of these scenarios are consistent with that view.